# The Meaning of Valentine’s Day #

A Valentine’s Day Reflection

Hello, my friends.

I hope this blog finds you in a joyful and loving spirit. Today is Valentine’s Day, a day dedicated to celebrating love in all its beautiful forms.

While it is often associated with romantic relationships, Valentine’s Day is also a time to cherish the bonds we share with our family, friends, and even ourselves.

But how did this day become such a worldwide celebration of love? The origins of Valentine’s Day date back to ancient Rome, where the festival of Lupercalia was observed in mid-February.

This festival was a celebration of fertility and the arrival of spring, marked by the exchange of love notes and small gifts.

One of its most intriguing customs was a matchmaking lottery, where bachelors would draw the names of single women, forming temporary—or sometimes lifelong—unions.

As history unfolded, this festival evolved into a Christian holiday, linked to the legendary Saint Valentine.

The most popular story about him tells of a compassionate priest who defied Emperor Claudius II’s decree banning marriages for young soldiers.

Believing in the power of love, Saint Valentine continued to perform secret marriages, an act that led to his imprisonment and eventual martyrdom.

Over time, his name became synonymous with love, and his legacy transformed into the modern Valentine’s Day we celebrate today.

Valentine’s Day has since become a global occasion for expressing love and appreciation.

From heartfelt love letters and romantic candlelight dinners to thoughtful gifts like flowers, chocolates, and jewelry, the day is filled with sweet gestures that make loved ones feel special.

However, love is not confined to romantic relationships alone—it extends to friendships, family bonds, and self-care.

Many people think that Valentine’s Day is just for couples, but in reality, it’s a day to spread love in all directions.

Whether it’s by spending time with friends, sharing laughter with family, or even treating yourself to something special, love knows no boundaries.

This year, I chose to celebrate my Valentine’s Day with my dearest bestie—my granddaughter. Her laughter, innocence, and pure heart bring me immeasurable joy.

We spent the day together, playing, sharing stories, and enjoying each other’s company. Sometimes, the most beautiful expression of love is not in grand gestures but in the simple moments of togetherness.

A warm hug, a smile, or a few heartfelt words can make the day truly special.

For senior citizens like myself, Valentine’s Day can also be a time for reflection and self-love.

As the years pass, we come to understand that love is not just about relationships; it is about embracing oneself with kindness and gratitude.

Whether it’s by treating yourself to something you enjoy, engaging in a hobby, or simply taking a peaceful walk in nature, self-love is just as important as the love we share with others.

Constant love is divine love, universal love—the kind of love that creates joy, happiness, and inner peace.

On this Valentine’s Day, let’s remember that love is not confined to a single person or a single day. It is a lifelong journey of giving and receiving, of cherishing the people around us, and, most importantly, of loving ourselves.

So, my dear readers, celebrate this day in your own unique way. Whether you are spending it with a partner, your family, your friends, or by pampering yourself—spread love, joy, and warmth wherever you go.

Wishing you all a very Happy Valentine’s Day! May your hearts be filled with love today and always.

BE HAPPY….BE ACTIVE….BE FOCUSED….BE ALIVE…

If you liked the post, please show your support by liking it,

following, sharing, and commenting.

Sure! Visit my website for more content. Click here

 www.retiredkalam.com



Categories: infotainment

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

19 replies

  1. Thanks for sharing this precious post 💗💗💗 Happy Valentine’s Day to you & your family!

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Happy Valentine’s Day. Enjoy the day with all your loves.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Happy Valentine’s day.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thank you, Sir😊✨
      Wishing you a day as beautiful as your kind words! ❤️🌸

      Liked by 2 people

    • Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

      In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
      ________________________________________
      ________________________________________

      Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

      Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

      Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

      Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

      What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

      A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

      If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

      The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

      Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

      The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

      If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

      In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

      The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

      An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

      The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

      The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

      The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

      The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

      No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

      Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

      Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

      Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Caleb Cheruiyot Cancel reply